Reviewing Two Months on Safari

Reviewing Two Months on Safari

TRevTitleI’ve just returned from two months in Africa, my 40th year of guiding there. I took consumers into five different countries in sub-Saharan Africa, toured three of its big cities and 14 of its most famous big game areas.

We stayed in hotels, lodges and tented camps from mid-market to super luxurious. Sometimes we used our own vehicles driving from place to place, and at other times we flew from place to place and used the property’s vehicles.

Tomorrow I’ll compare it all for you.

But before I do I want to explain why I think this is so important. We travel professionals are being marginalized by the internet, and consumers should know better.

Internet travel reviews like those found in TripAdvisor are often if not usually grossly inaccurate. This is because single event analyses are rarely fair. You wouldn’t want a real estate agent brokering your purchase of a home, or a doctor operating on your gall bladder for their very first time.

2oldersYet this is exactly what most travel reviews are: first-time consumer impressions. Strong reviews – good or bad – might be reflections of random events like unusual weather or public events or machinery breakdowns, or unusual personal interactions with an unrepresentative employee. None of these things might be recognized by the consumer as being unusual.

Moreover, most consumer reviews contain no measuring sticks of experience. They don’t know what it’s like next door or down the street, or at a different season. It’s a one-off experience that’s highly unlikely to be representative of the normal consumer experience.

And because many consumer reviews are from people who used consumer reviews before they planned their own vacation, mistake compounds mistake. Expectations might be way too high or way too low to begin with.

anniversaryBut of all the many reasons that consumer travel reviews are generally so wrong the single most obvious is consumers’ overwhelming demand for a low price. Especially among Americans price is the single-most driving factor in travel purchase.

Price should be an important consideration, but so many travelers believe they are due more than what they paid for. When price becomes this important it tends to erode performance and quality for a presumed gained “value.” This is the reason we’ve gone through such a horrible era of airline inconveniences.

RiverWalkPut all these things together and the typical consumer travel reviewer is not the type of person I would want to recommend a trip.

What I want is a person sufficiently experienced in the area of travel I’m considering. Indeed there are consumers just as good as travel professionals. When I find one of those it’s a bonanza, because that person isn’t saddled with the constraints of making a living out of her reviews and recommendations. But either way, a professional agent or a sufficiently experienced traveler is what will render a meaningful recommendation.

What constitutes sufficient experience? In my opinion there are four critical prerequisites for rendering a meaningful travel review:

capegoodhope✓ Multiple visits to the same place or property: More than two or three, the more the better, enough visits that both an array of seasonal weather and economic cycles are experienced, and enough visits that an anomalous situation can be recognized.

✓ Competitive selection. By this I mean experiencing a range of hotels, or beaches, or yachts, or trains in the same area so that the judgment rendered is contextual. You can’t apply the same standards to an Amazon jungle lodge that you would apply to the Peninsula in Hong Kong, or a kids’ family vacation to Disneyland to a week at the opera in Milan.

kathyk✓ Consistent purchasing. The “Honeymoon Weekend” purchased on LastMinute.Com won’t give you the same quality of rooms or package that buying it directly from the Niagra Falls Hotel will. It gets even more complicated: the same hotel room purchased directly from the Niagra Falls Hotel could render different qualities, frills and service depending upon how and when you made the purchase and what you actually paid for it.

✓ Minimize expectations. This is the hardest thing for a consumer to do, and understandably so. You don’t buy a vacation without expecting certain things from it. But the more this is the case, the less likely you will be able to render a meaningful review.

This doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t heed the good advice of trusted friends and family. They’re like you: They know probably better than a random professional what you might enjoy best.

But at the same time you better give that travel professional equal if not greater weight for all the reasons I’ve explained above.

Tomorrow I’ll try to do that for safaris in sub-Saharan Africa at this time of the year. Please come back!

GrandpaDriving

One thought on “Reviewing Two Months on Safari

  1. Jim,
    Sadly it is difficult not to agree with you. Fortunately, the people who seem to attach most weight to customer reviews are the very people who tend to post ill considered customer reviews themselves!.

    Value to me is comprised of three elements, relevance, quality and price and to make an accurate assessment requires the ability to make both vertical and horizontal comparisons which generally means you need to be an experienced traveller, paying your own way.

    Relevance is becoming more inportant these days as so many hotels bolt on things like leisure facilities which are not necessarily required by all users, particularly for one night stays. Having said that I do both view and post customer reviews on Hotels.com. I do this for the following reasons:

    1. I find responders to a specialist hotel site tend to be regular stayers and hence more objective in their assessments and more likely to post both good and bad reviews.

    2. I think I have now had enough travel experience to be able to spot genuine reviewers like myself.

    3. In a country like the US where options for overnight stays are so great, a means of winnowing out the rubbish, however crude, is valuable to me. For instance on my recent trip to the States, I selected the three star Stay Inn at Lombard for our Chicago base on the strength of a near perfect overall rating backed by some excellent reviews from obviously experienced travellers. I was not disappointed and in fact have stayed in worse five star properties. At the end of the day, I post an objective review because I am relying on others to do likewise and this has not yet let me down.

    I never consider the opinions of others in respect of either choice of airline or choice of restaurant as what is good or bad is too dependent on personal preference and other variables such as who was the chef! TripAdvisor is worse than useless and on my assessment includes few, if any, qualified reviewers. Ranking by area means that number 1 in area A could well be worse than number 10 in Area B!

    In respect of Safaris, the success of individual trips is only partially under human control. However, selecting an experienced guide (one with more than 40 years experience will do), selecting a respected guide (an honorary Masai Elder will do), selecting a guide who knows how to recognise the best local drivers in the business (a long time local benefactor will do) and selecting a guide who knows the best places to stay up and down the quality range (you will do) gives the customer the best chance of seeing the widest range of animals and birds. This formula continues to work incredibly well for your British contingent !

    Brian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.