Frighteningly Wonderful in Mali

Frighteningly Wonderful in Mali

France’s liberation of Timbuktu and defeat of Malian Islamic revolutionaries is right on schedule and demonstrates perfectly the American/French axis routing world terrorism.

Sunday’s Meet the Press roundtable was in contrast the perfect example of how fooled and even bamboozled old guard American media personalities still are. Andrea Mitchell excepted, the remaining two old men got almost everything wrong:

Ted Koppel who presided over the creation of the War of Terror in the media predicted “we’re entering one of the most dangerous eras this country has ever experienced.”

Wrong.

“I think it’s even bigger and more troubling than that,” pounced Bob Woodward, the man who broke Watergate and was apparently broken by it in return.

I’m making no bones about saying that France’s action will be short-lived, especially by the standards of American foreign involvements, and that it will be generally successful. As I said in earlier blogs, I think this is the end-game for the current era of terrorism. That doesn’t mean the end to terrorism, of course, just the end of the al-Qaeda chapter.

The end-game wasn’t supposed to be quite so publicly bloody, and this is largely because of American missteps in Mali. AFRICOM was the new American African command that set in pace a number of militaristic actions I’m ambivalent about, but which did chase al-Qaeda from Yemen to Somalia to central Africa and finally to North Africa where it was supposed to desiccate in the sand.

This three-year chase fragmented what had been a more structured and organized group of very bad guys. Separately, the Obama drone assassinations took out dozens of terrorist leaders, including of course the Top Gun. Like Sherman plowing through Georgia, death and destruction has been left in the wake, but…

…al-Qaeda is gone, Somalia has been pacified and terrorism has been chased on a long arc from Afghanistan down into east Africa and back up to North Africa … where now the French are pummeling it to death.

It got messy in Mali because Americans don’t speak French right. We trained the Malian army and held it up to public scrutiny as a model for modern African armies (allied, of course, to the west).

But those pesky French-speaking Africans got naughty and staged a coup against what we had also championed as one of Africa’s most stable democracies, and together with a few other events like generations of weapons released from Libya, the current war was precipitated.

Tuaregs have been fighting for independence since the dawn of the camel, and al-Qaeda remnants fleeing America’s silent sweep, pushed north into the southern flowing Libyan arms made uncomfortable but convenient bed fellows. For a while.

It couldn’t last. It didn’t. But it was strong enough long enough to give the French cause to attack. The French don’t dither like Americans. They never have, and their unique forms of morality are the same which continue to celebrate Napoleon’s tomb in the Champs de Mars.

So now what?

North Africa is a mess, but it isn’t the global threat that Afghanistan was. The trouble in Egypt is internal and will last for some time, but it will not spread. French foreign legion will be in Mali for some time, now, but fighting will diminish not spread into Niger or Nigeria as old men American commentators claim.

And the terrorism threat will diminish. The world will be more peaceful.

So why am I so unsettled and near sarcastic?

Because this was all planned. I see everything having happened to a a near perfect specific plan, a covert military mission organized by the Obama administration, cleaned up by the French. The French weren’t supposed to come out of the rafters, but they had to translate for the Americans. That was the only unplanned move. That this all worked and made the world peaceful is good.

That it is covert and so strikingly successful is terrifying.

5 thoughts on “Frighteningly Wonderful in Mali

  1. Much as you like to imagine this “clean up” by the French – the heroic colonial power sweeping in and saving the day – I beg to differ. First, France was protecting uranium supplies in Algeria on which her power grid depends. No nobility there. I feel that it is naive to think that the colonial powers acting tough fix much of anything. Nothing more than pyrrhic victories. This battle is not over. I do feel that the groups are doing what they do well, moving out and regrouping. Northern Africa is not yet a global threat but one cannot be naive about the deep seated resentment against colonialists by some. Surely there are those who welcome the French. I am pleased, of course, that Timbuktu has been liberated – but that does not mean that there does not continue to be a serious threat. Time will tell. I feel that there are other groups operating and with time there will be more and more revolts against colonialism. I am quite sure that Frances control of substantial Algerian uranium (if what I read is correct), will one day be fodder for revolutionaries who want their resources controlled by Algerians rather than former colonialists. I feel that the internal struggles of Egypt can spread just because of the instability in the region as borders become porous and weapons move more easily. The border between Egypt and Gaza, though not the major issue now, will become porous. US money poured into Egypt is already an issue as we have, unfortunately, sided with Morsi rather than with the secular intellectuals who are now (along with others) trying to create a true democracy… I often don’t agree with you… but I am thankful for these blogs, for it sets me reading about the areas you mention. I have not lived in Africa, as you have – but I have been a part of liberation movements in countries whose resources are controlled by other countries, and read from that perspective. There are enormous changes across the globe and though one may feel despair, I think that they are rich with possibility.

  2. Nice story, Jim. Just a couple of points. The French were direct because, as you point out, they’re French. We dithered because Obama realized that the last thing we need is another front.

    Second, Napoleon’s tomb in not in the Champs de Mars. It is in the Cathedrale du Dome in the Hotel National des Invalides located in its own park to the east of the Champ de Mars.

  3. I would be careful not to offend Americans like myself that are/have devoted their lives to conservation efforts.
    Your ” friend,” Naida
    Sent from my iPad

  4. “why are you sarcastic?”
    Is that a rhetorical question?
    you make some strong accusations re Obama administration. Wonder if you will hear from them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.