Gibson guitars and an African dictator, a major conservation group, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, and yes you guessed it, the T-Party, are banging out country and western lyrics headed for the Grammys. Dissonance par excellence.
I own (I think, my son took it about 10 years ago) a beautiful Gibson guitar which I played badly for years. Like most pseudo-musicians, my signature sound was volume. And despite repeated attempts to destroy the guitar, it remains in tact. Why? Because of its extraordinary craftsmanship and precious rainforest wood.
True musicians can hear the difference between a guitar they play using rosewood or ebony, and less rare versions of wood like binga.
According to Louisiana guitar maker, Mike Armand, “Different woods allow different tones.”
He says it’s all a matter of the way the wood handles humidity. Obviously wood from high humidity places like … well, say, Madagascar rainforests … handles humidity a lot better than wood grown in Canada.
Turn on your speakers and click here for the sound of a rosewood guitar. Billy D & The Hoodoos, a Portland group, are among many who claim they are worried now about traveling with their instruments over international boundaries.
As they should be. We can’t have it both ways, folks. (Although, read further down, it seems like everyone is trying to on this one.) If you believe that elephant ivory should be confiscated and traders across borders prosecuted, then the same should be true for Madagascar rosewood.
Rosewood (Leguminosae Fabaceae) and elephant (Loxodonta africana) are both found on Appendix I in the CITES treaty. Which means you cannot take those products across international borders.
CITES is that near perfectly functioning, marvelous world treaty that protects endangered species.
The reason is so simple it defies criminality. Wherever those things exist (elephants in Africa; rosewood in Madagascar) they are dying out, or will die out if not protected from commercial harvesting. So … leave it be.
The reason I want you to watch this video is because it was made in 2007 by a respectable conservation organization regarding their project to protect 10 million acres of Madagascar rainforest by 2010.
They failed. In fact, they failed miserably. About the same amount was logged, instead. They failed, because the Madagascar government was taken over by a hipster strongman who prior to siccing military on demonstrators was a young, popular Tana DJ who scratched vinyl with little regards for the tonality of sound. He has approached his current job in the same way.
Madagascar is, ergo, a mess. Mostly a decimated mess of scorched earth.
But it takes two to tango. Somebody’s got to buy the wood. Gibson knowingly violated the law. Why? For two reasons: (1) because rosewood makes such a pretty sound, and (2) they figured they could get away with it. So far they’re right on both counts.
Whether you believe in the whole morality of the CITES convention (as I do), certainly the issue of law is universally compelling. Right now, it’s against the law (worldwide) to buy Madagascar rosewood. And so, let it be. Or, change the law. Or, opt out of the treaty.
So although I have enough music still lingering somewhere deep inside and can definitely tell the difference between Pavarotti and Domingo, and probably even appreciate Billy D’s rosewood grace, if I’m a law abiding citizen, I’ll lobby Billy D not to take his rosewood guitar when he performs in Vancouver.
Gibson broke the law.
But… guess what. Gibson is not being prosecuted. U.S. Fish & Wildlife, which is responsible for preparing the prosecution for any violation of CITES, hasn’t acted on a judge’s instruction in the case, effectively putting the whole case on hold. It’s Fish & Wildlife’s move, and they don’t seem very anxious to do so.
And desperately in search of a political win, the T-Party has now “rallied” to Gibson’s side. I didn’t know Nashville extremists went further than murdering mothers-in-law.
Gibson is not being prosecuted.
Music is a dangerous stage on which to fight politics. But when CITES was adopted by the U.S. under the Reagan administration, Fish & Wildlife actually steamed off ivory keys from priceless pianos sent in or out of the country. Pianists have come to accept this.
Gibson has pursued raw materials with the same abandon as many of its pea-brained singers. Not just Madagascar rosewood, but also Fiji ebony. Both places are run by dictators intent on little more than making a buck for their families, who care not diddly squat about their fragile island ecologies which are ready to disappear.
Both appreciate Gibson’s business. It would make a very good country and western lyric.
After Fish & Wildlife revealed the investigation was taking place of Gibson’s interests in Madagascar, Gibson terminated its relationship with the Fiji devils. But it intends to fight the ban on Madagascar rosewood.
How? On what basis?
Well one successful strategy has been to buy out an otherwise established conservation organization. Yeah, that seems to be working. The Rainforest Alliance has certified Gibson as producing “sustainable products.” This is nonsense. CITES knows better than the Rainforest Alliance, but guess what? Guess who recently gave tens of thousands of dollars to the Rainforest Alliance? Not Hank Williams.
And then another strategy that seems to be working: Get T-Party-ers to scream veiled obscenities at Obama and be covered by FOX. And that fight seems to be working, too. Obama, as the old country and western tune opines, might just be that sheep in wolf’s clothing.
I am not surprised by any of this. What can we do to help STOP this? I don’t know which orgs. are working on this problem. I usually get petitions on line to sign but I don’t recall any recently. It is a shame about the Rainforest Alliance. I’ll have to send them a ltr.
A quote from the Rainforest Alliance:
Last year Gibson strengthened its commitment and took further steps to improve sustainability in its wood supply chain, with assistance from the Rainforest Alliance on some of these efforts.
The sustainable sourcing initiative that Gibson developed with our help has six elements:
* In 2010 Gibson established a baseline of its entire supply chain to determine which woods come from known or unknown, legally verified or sustainably certified sources, with 100 percent FSC-certified as the goal.
* Gibson is working to reduce risk in its supply chain by identifying potentially illegal or unsustainable sources. It is now requiring third-party verification or certification of legality, such as documented legal sources, for any wood species, supplier or source country where illegality is a known risk.
* Gibson’s sourcing of FSC-certified or legally verified wood and progress against the baseline are being validated by the Rainforest Alliance and formally reviewed by Gibson’s Chairman and CEO each year.
* Gibson continues to invest in the sustainability of its supply chain, providing support to community, indigenous and small and medium-sized enterprises working toward FSC certification.
* The company is also looking at alternative sources to reduce the need for rare woods, including composite materials, recycled woods and sourcing alternative species from FSC-certified forests whenever possible.
* Gibson’s Chairman and CEO has appointed a staff person to lead Gibson’s wood sourcing initiatives globally, as well as staff within each division and mill, who are accountable for sourcing tracking and improvements.
Working with the Rainforest Alliance, Gibson has recently made progress on sustainable sourcing:
* As of May 2011, a little over 50 percent of Gibson USA supply was from FSC-certified sources, and increasing amounts of supply came from either third party-verified “FSC Controlled Wood” or legally verified sources. Gibson supply managers have visited Guatemala, Indonesia, Mexicoand areas of the US and Canada seeking to expand FSC-certified supply.
* Gibson is testing new composite materials and alternative species for use in electric and acoustic guitar fret boards, the guitar component often made from rosewood and ebony.
* Gibson is supporting independent verification of legality for wood sources in several countries, including the US and Peru.
* The Gibson Foundation continues its commitment to fund training and provide support to indigenous-owned and small enterprises in Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru and Bolivia, which is helping to build FSC supply and providing increased incomes to forest-dependent communities.
I think coming down hard on Gibson is an over-reaction…I do not believe they have been charged with anything and yet are incurring economic damage from being used as “an example”. The Bozeman factory stands behind their supply as being certified and legal, as do their other production facilities.
We may not like the way the Madagascar government is utilizing their control over natural resources, but it can be a renewable income source. Working to develop the industry and make it sustainable would be more beneficial to more people on both continents than boycotting. There is a huge difference in my mind to slaughtering elephants by the hundreds for their ivory and learning to manage a forest to provide a needed resource and jobs.
Right after we impeach Obama and arrest Holder for lying.
You should start a campaign on change.org!
This would make for a great news story 🙂
In as much as the world appreciates the products coming form forests, clearing natural resources is badly damaging our world. We may just enjoy the products coming out of natural resources now, but our children, grand children will suffer the damage we are causing. I am really in support of the government in regulating the cutting of wood to save our world and to make it a good place to live in. Imagine our worlds are centered around forestry…. the wildlife the birds all depend on us to protect their homes….