Joining The Club!

Joining The Club!

strictconstructionCongratulations, America! You have now joined the exclusive club of despotic African societies!

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision aligns America with numerous African dictatorships and sequesters us from virtually all the rest of the developed world.

The increasing number of despots and autocratic lawmakers in Africa is directly linked to democracies which “freely and fairly” elect them. “Freely and fairly” is governed by individual African constitutions and laws, as everywhere in the world.

Constitutions and laws in Uganda, Zimbabwe, Cameroon, Angola, Ethiopia – among others – require their leaders and lawmakers to be democratically elected. The most recent atrocity was in Zimbabwe, where even the European Union could not find mistakes in the democratic process which brought the dictator Robert Mugabe to power for his 34th year:

“The EU congratulates the people of Zimbabwe for a peaceful vote and for turning out in high numbers. It welcomes the generally peaceful and orderly manner in which the elections were conducted.”

Zimbabwe’s election was hailed as free and fair by South Africa, that was appointed by several world agencies as the principal moderator, and the African Union.

Here’s the point: Mugabe is horrible for his people and somehow, they are fooled into thinking otherwise.

That’s what money does. That’s what television advertising that tells lies which cannot be challenged in court does. Most people can be convinced by repeated lying.

The specific successful social mechanics that create such a bad outcome were perfectly documented by Human Rights Watch analyzing Zimbabwe’s January elections:

– voter intimidation;
– “ghost” or duplicate voters;
– citizens prevented from voting in opposition areas; and
– state media support for incumbents.

While I think there are plausible arguments that America does similarly, that’s not the point, either. All the HRW infractions cited are legal in Zimbabwe.

If a so-called “democratic society” allows practices clearly intended to dupe or otherwise undermine the free will of its people, the elections can nonetheless be “free and fair.”

So it’s hard to fault our Supreme Court for the decision. It was a logical one. What is the problem is not the Supreme Court, it’s America’s constitution that the Court is “upholding.”

Money rules. Drill down to all the horrible practices in Zimbabwe or any African country, and you get to “influence” which is “money.”

As soon as a certain oligarchy in any society is able to control a certain large percentage of that society’s wealth, they can sustain themselves “freely and fairly” using democracy.

That’s what yesterday’s Supreme Court decision affirms. The American constitution was created more than 200 years ago to protect independent landowners from British domination: to protect the oligarchy capable of ruling distant America.

Albeit that these great men might have been beneficent, they had no intention of ceding any power whatever to slaves or other minorities, much less women or the poor. They constructed a government to protect themselves as better than their British overlords.

The chances of changing the American constitution right now are less than changing Zimbabwe’s, yet that is exactly what has to happen to remove America from the putrid stagnation of a despotic future.

Jim filed this post from Karatu, Tanzania.

Update: Is Kenya Safe?

Update: Is Kenya Safe?

Found only in Kenya: the reticulated giraffe.
Found only in Kenya: the reticulated giraffe.
I’m not a contrarian, and for the past three years I’ve restrained to near zero EWT’s brokerage of Kenyan tourism. But despite the bad news yesterday, I see Kenyan tourist security improving.

Monday night one of the most deadly terrorist blasts (after the Westgate Mall incident) rocked the Eastleigh neighborhood of Nairobi. It was incorrectly reported by many agencies, however, that this area was “downtown Nairobi.”

Seven people were killed and another 25 injured (ten seriously) when terrorists threw hand grenades into two popular evening restaurants. This Eastleigh area of Nairobi is often known as “Little Mogadishu.”

A week ago Sunday gunmen entered a church in Likoni, Mombasa, and sprayed gunfire on the parishioners killing four.

And I wrote a month ago about the tourist attacks that failed in Zanzibar.

These are all closely related incidents, horrible if you are an East African, and completely predictable.

I’ve written extensively how the Obama/Hollande war on terrorism in Africa is founded on having made Kenya a military force to be reckoned with. This new military power has dislodged al-Shabaab and other al-Qaeda influences from Kenya’s neighbor, Somalia.

For the first time since Clinton’s foreign policy failures embodied in “Blackhawk Down” Somalia looks hopeful. America and France and all the western world is much, much safer.

Drones above the Somali, Kenya and Tanzanian coasts have wiped out more than two dozen terrorist leaders. U.S. special forces have chased those that remain into the interior of Africa where France is sealing their fate in the C.A.R. and Malawi.

But Kenya’s taking the hit for all of this.

Unable to create any significant retaliation to Obama’s wars in Africa, the much weakened terrorist cells in the horn of Africa are creating terror in the last places they’re able to:

The Somali communities in East Africa.

These communities, whether in and near Mombasa, Zanzibar or “Little Mogadishu” in Nairobi are overwhelmingly supportive of the war against terror and the Kenyan military occupation.

But simply because of the ethnic makeup of these communities, the remaining terrorists have entrees they don’t have elsewhere in Kenya or Tanzania.

And their anger is only slightly less against their fellow Somalis who they consider traitors than to Obama and the greater war on terror.

Kenya’s worst terrorist incident since the 1998 bombing of the American embassy was the Westgate Mall attack last September. But as I wrote at the time, these were latent global terrorists likely including Somalis not from Somalia, but Minneapolis.

That kind of terrorism is the real threat to tourism. The other horrible more recent acts are just too highly targeted ethnically to threaten tourists.

The Westgate Mall attack resulted in incredibly draconian Kenyan government responses, undoubtedly supported by America and others, that has hugely restricted a number of freedoms in Kenya.

I don’t think that’s good. But in the irony of the times, where America is so much safer than Kenya, tourists are now safer than ordinary Kenyan citizens.

And in my anxious estimation, tourists are increasingly safe.

Previous years’ tourist kidnapping and armed robberies of tourists in places like Lamu, Samburu and Shaba have ended. And the Kenyan government response to Westgate has been an iron fist.

Those are the facts that make the rarity and beauty of the reticulated giraffe and the legendary attraction of Kenya’s Maasai Mara safer for tourists than they have been for nearly five years. I’m not suggesting that tourism safety is the only obstacle to enjoying a vacation in Kenya.

While I’m willing to plan safaris again in Kenya, the main cities of Nairobi and Mombasa and Stone Town (Zanzibar) are out for the time being. Anyone for whom we make arrangements in Kenya also knows that we’ll pivot in an instant if the situation changes.

There are plenty of wonderful places for safaris in Tanzania. And if optimal game viewing is not the only goal, multiple great safaris are available in Zambia, Botswana and South Africa as well.

But for someone asking me now, is Kenya safe enough for a safari, my answer is the above qualified yes.

Jim filed this post from Karatu, Tanzania.