Does Al-Qaeda Now Own Territory in the Maghreb?

Does Al-Qaeda Now Own Territory in the Maghreb?

By Conor Godfrey
The situation in Mali gets more complicated every day.

As predicted in an earlier blog, regional and national bodies are moving (slowly) toward a negotiated solution to the governance crisis brought on by the March 22nd coup.

The North, however, is a total mess.

The French defense minister called Northern Mali a West African Afghanistan.

That is too alarmist, but the situation certainly calls for some alarm.

There are half a dozen players in Northern Mali at the moment, but they can generally be corralled into two camps – Tuareg nationalists, and Islamic fundamentalists.

(This obviously soothes over some nuances.) Of course, to confuse matters, all of the Tuareg nationalists are Muslim, and many of the fundamentalists are Tuareg.

Put simply, the Tuareg nationalists, led by the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), demand recognition of the independent republic of Azawad in Northern Mali as the Tuareg homeland.

The Islamic Fundamentalists, led by Ansar Dine (loosely “Defenders of the Faith”), demand the implementation of Islamic law across Mali.

They have also declared allegiance to al-Qaeda, and can be seen as a Qaeda franchise similar to AL-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).

So the obvious compromise was tentatively reached on May 26th – the two groups merged and declared independence for the independent state of Azawad, and announced that the Koran would be the basis for Azawad’s legal system.

The point here is that a group openly aligned with al-Qaeda now controls territory the size of France.

Luckily or unluckily, I think the marriage between the Tuareg nationalists and the Qaeda sympathizers will collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.

No sooner had their deal been signed did the two sides begin spinning the agreement to their respective constituencies. (In fact, there are rumors as I am writing this that the pact has already been called off.)

One spokesperson for the Tuareg nationalists (MNLA) hedged as follows: “The Koran will be a source of the laws of the state…but we will apply the things we want and leave aside those we don’t. It will not be a strict application of the law.” (Source)

While the MNLA spokespeople were all assuring domestic supporters and foreign analysts of their moderation and anti-terror agenda, their new partners Ansar Dine were busy beating female protesters, whipping people out of bars, and banning soccer.

Banning soccer of course led to the largest protests.

In this power struggle, any sane person is routing for the Tuareg nationalist elements to prevail.

Once the government stops imploding in Bamako they will at least be able to negotiate with the MNLA.

Conceivably, a strong government in Bamako backed by an implicit ECOWAS or French military threat could make the Tuaregs settle for drastically increased autonomy and other perks. (Whether this is fair or not is a different question.)

If Ansar Dine and AQIM marginalize the Tuareg nationalists however, then Bamako and/or the region will be obligated to solve the conflict by force.

There is little room for compromise with abject fundamentalism.

Using force will spin off other problems such as increasing the distrust and dislike between Tuareg civilians and the rank and file of the Malian army.

The MNLA has about 1,000 fighters at its command, while Ansar Dine and AQIM have approximately 500 a piece.

Unfortunately, the Islamists are much better armed and funded than their MNLA partners cum rivals. (Source)

The main hope for the MNLA and other Tuareg nationalists is that the civilian Tuareg population in Northern Mali (or Azawad if you wish) has no interest in Ansar Dine’s social program.

They may have welcomed Ansar Dine momentarily as a cure for the total lawlessness of the military campaign, but in general, Tuareg Muslims like to attend a soccer match from time to time, and have little appetite for returning to 7th century Islamic social law.

It will also be interesting to watch the U.S., France, and regional bodies debate intervention: will they really let an al-Qaeda aligned group control three airstrips and that much territory?

The Malian army will not be ready to handle the crisis any time soon.

I think this would be a wonderful opportunity for ECOWAS to show its teeth, but I have an awful feeling that France might end up wielding the stick.

The End of the Gacaca Era

The End of the Gacaca Era

By Conor Godfrey
Earlier this month the last of the Rwandan Gacaca (‘Lawn’) courts closed down.

These communal tribunals, chaired by a council of elders in each community, have processed over 100,000 cases pertaining to the Rwandan genocide.

Since 2001, almost all of the civilian cases have been heard in Gacaca courts, while the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda has dealt with abuses committed by the military and other high-ranking officials.

The closure of this judicial chapter has prompted a number of retrospectives from supporters and detractors alike.

If you are unfamiliar with the Gacaca system, read the first two pages of this report for a very evocative depiction of a typical proceeding.

Imagine 9 village leaders elected for their ‘moral character’ arrayed in the village square.

A proposed genocidaire is then marched in front of the elders, with the entire community looking on.

The perpetrator confesses to one or several acts of violence, and then the elders query the crowd to see if anyone else has any other charges to bring against the accused.

After the community has weighed in, the elders determine the punishment and the matter is closed.

These courts were empowered to level sentences of up to life in prison.

My “made in America” mind immediately jumps to all the possible ways that this arrangement could go wrong, but the more I think about it, the less confident I feel condemning the Gacaca system.

Sure- the opportunities for local corruption are huge.

Witness intimidation and other forms of extra-judicial pressure, along with highly variable sentencing, probably led to many miscarriages of justice.

Read this Human Rights Watch report for a really negative view of the whole affair.

And yes, I think it is a rather horrid idea to deal with sexual violence in such a public manner.

However – how else could a country process hundreds of thousands of victims and hundreds of thousands of perpetrators?

Also, as flawed as this process might have been, the public airing of accusations seems to have had a cathartic effect on Rwandan society.

This largely laudatory article points specifically to the fact that many relatives were able to learn where their relatives were buried—a long festering obstacle to reconciliation.

When Americans use the word justice in an international context they really mean western justice.

Western countries also financially underwrite many of the international community’s judicial institutions, thus further entrenching one form of justice as the international norm.

However, that particular system’s focus on free will, individual responsibility and retribution jive poorly with communal conflicts and systemic abuse of any particular group. (Just think of how poorly the U.S. justice system has dealt with racial issues over the last century.)

The truth and reconciliation model allows more people to participate, lends itself to resolving communal conflicts as opposed to punishing aberrant individuals, and, on a more mundane level, is financially and logistically feasible in a country with hundreds of thousands of cases and very limited legal resources

Gacaca courts were far from perfect, but I am glad that 130,000 ex-combatants are no longer rotting in jail waiting for a trial, and hundreds of thousands of victims have been able to yell their accusations out in public.

A Tale of Two Safaris

A Tale of Two Safaris

By Conor Godfrey
I have the good fortune to be writing this from a stunning lodge in the town of Aguas Calientes just a few hundred meters below Machu Picchu.

For the last week Jim has led myself and 10 other souls on a trip through Peru and Bolivia that included a week in the dense jungles of the Amazon basin and a week in gorgeous Andean highlands of the former Quechua/Inca empire.

This is the second safari I have taken with Jim and Explorers World Travel (EWT), and the two experiences could not have been more different.

I thought I might compare the previous East Africa trip with this most recent experience for the benefit of anyone considering a guided trip.

Remember, these are simply my amateur comments as a consumer, and do not reflect the opinion of Jim or EWT. (Look here for the official descriptions.)

Most Safari goers are not professional botanists, anthropologists, geologists, or masters of some other sub-specialty that would skew their interests toward any one particular type of experience. (There is, however, a wonderful microbiologist on my current trip).

If you fall into the plurality of consumers that want a little natural history, some great flora and fauna, and luxury to wash it all down, then East Africa will meet and likely exceed your expectations.

On my East African safari spectacular game viewing was never more than twenty minutes away from any given lodge.

By the end of the Safari you might realistically be bored of elephants charging your car and giant crocs taking down wildebeest.

That being said, the emphasis in East Africa was squarely on the game viewing.

Amazonia and the Andean highlands offer a more holistic experience.

The variety of flora in the jungle is unparalleled, and your guides will bring each plant to life by tying it into the jungle tapestry – the fire tree hosts the fire ant, the papaya seeds kill stomach parasites, the giant termite nests provide homes for bats and birds, etc…

Both the jungle and the highlands also offer the more culture-minded traveler much food for thought.

I was shocked and intrigued by the cultural interplay between the mountains and the lowlands in Peru, and two short weeks were sufficient to give me a grounding in the Peruvian cultural dynamics.

Jim offers great cultural tidbits throughout the East African safari, but most of your mental energy will be devoted to understanding big cat behavior as opposed to delving into the East African cultural landscape.

The jungle is not deficient in charismatic game (especially not in birds), but it makes you work much harder to find it.

A fleeting glimpse of a Tapir, or, if you are lucky, a jaguar, will likely require a long trek through a humid jungle with mosquitoes nipping at any exposed skin and sweat soaking the ‘lightweight’ pants you bought before the trip.

If East Africa feels like a wild zoo, than the Amazon feels like a bona fide bush hunt.

The excitement does not come from overwhelming numbers of game, but from the thrill of tracking paw prints, listening to the Jungle, and using your newly learned jungle lore to track the elusive animals.

(There is still a cold beer at the end of your day to chase down the parasites you’ve acquired.)

This feeling extends to the jungle lodgings.

No amount of money is going to make your room totally impregnable to big spiders, or guarantee you hot water (as opposed to the opulent lodgings available in East Africa).

Trekking deep in the Amazon trades luxury for a unique learning experience; I think for some travelers the trade off would be well worth it.

My two cents: If you are unsure what you are looking for, and want to guarantee a fabulous, restorative vacation, go to East Africa with Jim.

The lodges and the big game will blow your mind.

If big game is not your end all and be all, or if luxury is not required for your personal brand of relaxation, then a joint Andes – Amazonia trip might be just the ticket.

Safari Njema!

Farmers Driving Lamborghinis

Farmers Driving Lamborghinis

By Conor Godfrey
Yessir. One of the world’s foremost Agriculture oracles, Jim Rogers, recently claimed Agriculture is the oil of the twenty first century on HowwemadeitinAfrica.com.

More evocatively, he quipped that investors should consider indirect plays on agriculture investment such as opening Lamborghini dealerships in farm country, because soon, “farmers are going to be driving the Lamborghinis; stock brokers are going to be driving tractors.”

Jim sees big things in the future for all the world’s breadbaskets: the American mid-west, the Australian outback, and a number of South Asian deltas for example.

But I wouldn’t be writing this blog unless he was the most bullish on Africa.

He summed up the potential for African agriculture like this – “In some of the African nations you don’t even have to farm, just sit by the side of the road long enough and something will grow.”

I have heard very similar sentiments from American farmers in Uganda, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Angola.

In Uganda for example, the expats marvel that you just have to throw some seeds over your shoulder, turn around, and they will have grown into a forest.

A few weeks ago I wrote a blog post about the perceptions and mis-perceptions of land grabs in Africa.

In short, to coin an old cliché, Africa is the Saudi Arabia of uncultivated, highly arable land, and everyone wants in.

There are two meta trends involving agriculture at the moment that will have a huge impact on Africa for better or worse.

First – prices for commodities that Africa can or already does produce are trending upward for the very long term.

Unless science makes food obsolete or disaster reduces the planet’s population by a few billion, food prices will stay high in historical terms.

The equal and opposite counter trend regarding African Agriculture is climate change.

The African Development Bank and other multi-laterals predict harsh declines in African land productivity over the next 50 years due to changes in rainfall patterns (About 4% decrease annually as a continental average.)

It seems like the smart money – whether you are in development or in the private sector – is on agricultural technology that will mitigate climate risk while taking advantage of superior soil and other factor advantages.

While Lamborghini dealerships in Abidjan are probably still a risky play, irrigation equipment, low-water varietals, and agricultural inputs are all highly lucrative and sustainable ways to think about African agriculture moving forward.

After all, global supermarkets are already increasing the proportion of produce coming from the continent.

If you have ever had an “Out of Africa” fantasy – now is the time to move to the continent and start your farm.